Developer knowledge network · moderated exchange

UnreliableCode 커뮤니티

개발자 연구, 리버스 엔지니어링 및 코딩 커뮤니티

Knowledge index살다
4Categories
919Threads
2.8K게시물
Discussion

Comparing std::atomic<T> memory models: Sequentially Consistent vs Relaxed Performance [StackOverflow Architecture Guide]

cpp_concurrency_guru
C++ Standards Expert
MEMBER
대표: 47
가입 날짜: Feb 2018
게시물: 17
감사해요: 75
1개월 전 · Jul 6, 2026 9:46 PM
#1

When is std::memory_order_relaxed actually safe to use?

Relaxed atomic operations guarantee atomicity (no data races on the single variable itself) but provide zero synchronization or ordering constraints relative to other memory accesses.

CPP
// Safe for independent counters
std::atomic<uint64_t> g_totalPacketCount{0};
void OnPacketReceived() {
    g_totalPacketCount.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
}

Because other threads only read the counter for telemetry (without relying on it to guard other data), relaxed is 100% safe and saves CPU pipeline synchronization cycles on ARM and RISC-V.

memory_model_mook
Low-Level C Veteran
MEMBER
대표: 163
가입 날짜: Jan 2019
게시물: 11
감사해요: 33
1개월 전 · Jul 7, 2026 1:46 AM
#2

Use relaxed for metrics, telemetry, and statistics. Use acquire-release for flags that synchronize shared buffers.

profiler_pat
Performance Hunter
MEMBER
대표: 146
가입 날짜: Aug 2019
게시물: 33
감사해요: 31
1개월 전 · Jul 7, 2026 8:31 PM
#3

Clear rule of thumb that prevents over-synchronization in high-throughput engines.