Developer knowledge network · moderated exchange

UnreliableCode コミュニティ

開発者リサーチ、リバース エンジニアリング、コーディング コミュニティ

Discussion

Comparing std::atomic<T> memory models: Sequentially Consistent vs Relaxed Performance [StackOverflow Architecture Guide]

cpp_concurrency_guru
C++ Standards Expert
MEMBER
担当者: 47
参加日: Feb 2018
投稿: 17
ありがとう: 75
1 か月前 · Jul 6, 2026 9:46 PM
#1

When is std::memory_order_relaxed actually safe to use?

Relaxed atomic operations guarantee atomicity (no data races on the single variable itself) but provide zero synchronization or ordering constraints relative to other memory accesses.

CPP
// Safe for independent counters
std::atomic<uint64_t> g_totalPacketCount{0};
void OnPacketReceived() {
    g_totalPacketCount.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
}

Because other threads only read the counter for telemetry (without relying on it to guard other data), relaxed is 100% safe and saves CPU pipeline synchronization cycles on ARM and RISC-V.

memory_model_mook
Low-Level C Veteran
MEMBER
担当者: 163
参加日: Jan 2019
投稿: 11
ありがとう: 33
1 か月前 · Jul 7, 2026 1:46 AM
#2

Use relaxed for metrics, telemetry, and statistics. Use acquire-release for flags that synchronize shared buffers.

profiler_pat
Performance Hunter
MEMBER
担当者: 146
参加日: Aug 2019
投稿: 33
ありがとう: 31
1 か月前 · Jul 7, 2026 8:31 PM
#3

Clear rule of thumb that prevents over-synchronization in high-throughput engines.