Developer knowledge network · moderated exchange

Zajednica UnreliableCode

Zajednica za istraživanje, obrnuti inženjering i programiranje programera

Knowledge indexŽivjeti
4Categories
919Threads
2.8KPostovi
Discussion

Comparing std::atomic<T> memory models: Sequentially Consistent vs Relaxed Performance [StackOverflow Architecture Guide]

cpp_concurrency_guru
C++ Standards Expert
MEMBER
Rep: 47
Datum pridruživanja: Feb 2018
Postovi: 17
Hvala: 75
prije 1 mjeseci · Jul 6, 2026 9:46 PM
#1

When is std::memory_order_relaxed actually safe to use?

Relaxed atomic operations guarantee atomicity (no data races on the single variable itself) but provide zero synchronization or ordering constraints relative to other memory accesses.

CPP
// Safe for independent counters
std::atomic<uint64_t> g_totalPacketCount{0};
void OnPacketReceived() {
    g_totalPacketCount.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
}

Because other threads only read the counter for telemetry (without relying on it to guard other data), relaxed is 100% safe and saves CPU pipeline synchronization cycles on ARM and RISC-V.

memory_model_mook
Low-Level C Veteran
MEMBER
Rep: 163
Datum pridruživanja: Jan 2019
Postovi: 11
Hvala: 33
prije 1 mjeseci · Jul 7, 2026 1:46 AM
#2

Use relaxed for metrics, telemetry, and statistics. Use acquire-release for flags that synchronize shared buffers.

profiler_pat
Performance Hunter
MEMBER
Rep: 146
Datum pridruživanja: Aug 2019
Postovi: 33
Hvala: 31
prije 1 mjeseci · Jul 7, 2026 8:31 PM
#3

Clear rule of thumb that prevents over-synchronization in high-throughput engines.