Developer knowledge network · moderated exchange

مجتمع الكود غير الموثوق به

أبحاث المطورين، مجتمع الهندسة العكسية والترميز

Knowledge indexيعيش
4Categories
919Threads
2.8Kدعامات
Discussion

Comparing std::atomic<T> memory models: Sequentially Consistent vs Relaxed Performance [StackOverflow Architecture Guide]

cpp_concurrency_guru
C++ Standards Expert
MEMBER
مندوب: 47
تاريخ الانضمام: Feb 2018
دعامات: 17
شكرًا: 75
1 months ago · Jul 6, 2026 9:46 PM
#1

When is std::memory_order_relaxed actually safe to use?

Relaxed atomic operations guarantee atomicity (no data races on the single variable itself) but provide zero synchronization or ordering constraints relative to other memory accesses.

CPP
// Safe for independent counters
std::atomic<uint64_t> g_totalPacketCount{0};
void OnPacketReceived() {
    g_totalPacketCount.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_relaxed);
}

Because other threads only read the counter for telemetry (without relying on it to guard other data), relaxed is 100% safe and saves CPU pipeline synchronization cycles on ARM and RISC-V.

memory_model_mook
Low-Level C Veteran
MEMBER
مندوب: 163
تاريخ الانضمام: Jan 2019
دعامات: 11
شكرًا: 33
1 months ago · Jul 7, 2026 1:46 AM
#2

Use relaxed for metrics, telemetry, and statistics. Use acquire-release for flags that synchronize shared buffers.

profiler_pat
Performance Hunter
MEMBER
مندوب: 146
تاريخ الانضمام: Aug 2019
دعامات: 33
شكرًا: 31
1 months ago · Jul 7, 2026 8:31 PM
#3

Clear rule of thumb that prevents over-synchronization in high-throughput engines.