Developer knowledge network · moderated exchange

مجتمع الكود غير الموثوق به

أبحاث المطورين، مجتمع الهندسة العكسية والترميز

Knowledge indexيعيش
4Categories
919Threads
2.8Kدعامات
Discussion

Why virtual destructors are mandatory when deleting derived objects via base pointers [StackOverflow Architecture Guide]

raii_clean_coder
Modern C++ Advocate
MEMBER
مندوب: 190
تاريخ الانضمام: Aug 2020
دعامات: 20
شكرًا: 22
3 weeks ago · Aug 1, 2026 9:58 AM
#1

What actually happens under the hood when a base class lacks a virtual destructor:

CPP
class Base {
public:
    ~Base() { std::cout << "~Base\n"; }
};
class Derived : public Base {
    std::vector<int> m_buffer;
public:
    ~Derived() { std::cout << "~Derived\n"; }
};

Base* p = new Derived();
delete p; // UNDEFINED BEHAVIOR!

Because ~Base() is non-virtual, the compiler performs static dispatch calling only Base::~Base(). The Derived destructor is never executed, leaking m_buffer's dynamic heap memory!

sanitizer_sam
UB Hunter
MEMBER
مندوب: 119
تاريخ الانضمام: Apr 2021
دعامات: 10
شكرًا: 53
3 weeks ago · Aug 1, 2026 12:22 PM
#2

The ISO C++ standard explicitly states that deleting a derived object through a pointer to a base class with a non-virtual destructor results in undefined behavior (UB).

modern_cpp_artisan
C++ Template Wizard
MEMBER
مندوب: 124
تاريخ الانضمام: Jun 2019
دعامات: 29
شكرًا: 72
3 weeks ago · Aug 2, 2026 3:33 AM
#3

Guideline from C++ Core Guidelines: A base class destructor must be either public and virtual, or protected and non-virtual.